The predominate image of public defenders in the American
zeitgeist is of under-qualified, over-worked, recent law school graduates who
will offer such substandard legal services a defendant may be better proceeding
pro se. This perception is often compounded when dealing with Federal Indian
law and Tribal law, due to historic practices of denying tribes
self-determination and self-governance. The United States stripped away
portions of tribes’ ability to govern, and then turned around and blamed problems
faced by tribes on their lack of governance.
While recent decades have seen minimal returns of criminal jurisdiction,
particularly in the area of domestic violence, it often comes with the
requirements of conforming tribal court systems to the Anglo model with less
regard for traditional restorative justice and peacemaking that do not mandate
jail time. Trying to balance federal limitations and tribal custom is a
continual challenge, particularly when examined in conjunction with the notion
that tribes need to import the American model of justice, one focused on
punishment, which has resulted in 25% of the world’s prison population and
being the only country to sentence youth to life without parole. Understanding
the difficult balance between federal, state, and tribal jurisdiction is not
something that can be fully understood in a week’s experience although it
pervades every single step attorneys and tribal advocates take. There are
centuries of shifting policies and attitudes to take into account and simply
deciding that everything needs to be more “Americanized” would be to repeat
historical errors and violate the current policy of the federal government
which stresses the importance of allowing tribes to determine their own
governance, and as much as possible deliver their own services.
Despite the difficulties I knew I would face as an outsider
to the tribe, I was incredibly excited for my placement in the Navajo Nation
Public Defense Office. Having already taken American Indian Law and been
offered a summer clerkship at DNA People’s Legal Services, I was anxious to see
the how the policies played out in practice. When I arrived and met my
supervisors Kathy and Rosa, I knew I found a place where my ideals and passions
were not just tolerated, but celebrated. These women did not see public defense
as a stepping stone to a larger career, but as a life-long calling and plan on
staying with PD until their retirement. Public defense is not easy work and it
takes a unique level of dedicated and determination to stand up every day and
fight for people that many think are not worth the energy. They strive to
uphold a high standard of due process while retaining traditional values. That
these women have continued to make that stand for longer than I have been alive
inspires me in ways that words cannot adequately convey. There are no material
goods or words to offer that can express my thanks for the time they spent and
wisdom they shared with me this week. The best I can do is continue their
amazing legacy by remaining committed to the aid of those who would otherwise
have nowhere to turn.
Dee Glickman
Dee Glickman
No comments:
Post a Comment